Anonymous ID: d30f59 March 1, 2021, 1:46 p.m. No.13081050   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1061

>>13080597

>65d3eb

/\/\/\/\/\/\

Take note, that's how you do a hottie slide. 37 posts so far, and probably 38 before I finish typing.

They're probably in the cubicle right next to you. Go ask for pointers.

Anonymous ID: d30f59 March 1, 2021, 1:51 p.m. No.13081075   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1120

>>13080954

>[that's] the message I got

The problem with that interpretation is that it would only be for anons, and others (generic normies, friends, family members) would be left to roll the dice. That's a pretty dark view.

Anonymous ID: d30f59 March 1, 2021, 2:12 p.m. No.13081174   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13081120

>So do you suggest that we all just ignore this idea ?

No, that was my natural progression of thought on that post, as well.

I'm just noting the dark side to that interpretation. I'm one of those "Qtards",

so most of my friends and family dismiss my warnings now, unfortunately.

Anonymous ID: d30f59 March 1, 2021, 2:27 p.m. No.13081260   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13080554

>Hmmmm…..

Indeed. Where the wreckage split it showed clear evidence on the aft portion of the fuselage of burning

which was not shown on the forward section, suggesting the center tank explosion was not the intiating

event. Many witnesses reporting seeing two missiles, one loitering north of the military training zone.

Brit subs had recently been retrofitted to fire American Tomahawks, and training exercises on defense

of littoral waters (close to shore) was all the rage. I think it was an exercise gone wrong; a JSOW meant

to take out a dummy warhead Tomahawk (entered right side of fuselage, exited left side and left exhaust

debris on seats) had a good hit on the target missile, but also took down TWA800. CYA ensued.