the total number of people in these organizations is in the millions, the total number of groups in the thousands. and what can we do to stop it? but only one has the ability and only one has shown to be effective at doing so. who do you represent? no, but the next person to attack could be, so a healthy scepticism is a good thing. the result is obvious. not by the maneuvers of the lobbies and the parliaments and the congresses, it will come under the stress of necessity. diversity is weakness, unity is strength radicalization of western men the radicalization of young western men is not just unavoidable, but inevitable. mass immigration will disenfranchise us, subvert our nations, destroy our communities, destroy our ethnic binds, destroy our cultures, destroy our peoples. this wealth and prosperity was paid for in the sweat and blood of your ancestors. -altered version of “ the beginnings ” by rudyard kipling to conservatives ask yourself, truly, what has modern conservatism managed to conserve?

roma, african, indian, turkish, semitic or other. those that are ethnically and culturally european. if the media or state in your region attacks them, destroy the corporation and traitorous politicians responsible. new zealand was not the original choice for attack, i only arrived to new zealand to live temporarily whilst i planned and trained, but i soon found out that new zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the west. we attack as soon as possible, we attack with force and we achieve stability and play defense as the boomers pass, not during their passing, not after. do you consider it a terrorist attack?

>what can we do to fix it?