but the unarmed invader, we have no real idea on how to deal with them, we are unable to attack them or fend them off in any meaningful way. that means those that can, or have the ability should look to ingrain themselves into these institutions and climb as far up the power hierarchy as possible, in the shortest time possible. you can not expect others do take the risks for you, nor should you wish for others to labour for you, if you are unwilling. they were not easily moved, they were icy – willing to wait till every count should be proved, ere the saxon began to hate. all possibility of expression and belief was open to be taught, discussed and spoken. there was a racial component to the attack. lobby those in power to show your support, protest outside embassies of those nations that do not support the nation, and if need be attack them. was the attack anti-immigration in origin? secondly an attack in new zealand would bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilization, that no where in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world and that there was no where left to go that was safe and free from mass immigration. luckily for us, the end results of this deracialized, irreligious and deculturized program show themselves. the europe of the future is not one of concrete and steel, smog and wires but a place of forests, lakes, mountains and meadows.

only for muslims. the gun owners of new zealand are a beaten, miserable bunch of baby boomers, who have long since given up the fight.when was the last time they won increased rights? did they perceive us any differently after the attack than they did before? these i hate. the going will be tough and many of us will die. why is that their non diverse nations do so much better than our own, and on so many different metrics?

>though wise men at their end know dark is right, because their words had forked no lightning they do not go gentle into that good night.

why were we allowing the invaders to conquer us? victors write the history and the writers of history control the cultural climate of the present time. did you intend to kill police officers or other enforcers of the state? you're fucking dead, kiddo. you think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the internet? more often than not these ngos hide their true intentions behind a facade of religiosity and only once you investigate into the leadership and governance of the ngo itself do you find the people running the show are in fact far from religious themselves and more often than not are actually atheistic cultural marxists using naive christian europeans to both labour and fund fund their own attempt at class and racial warfare. diversity by its very definition belies equality. any method that gives these traitors their sure reward is viable and should be encouraged. make your plans, get training, form alliances, get equipped and then act. move as one, full support for brother nations accept death, embrace infamy death is certain, you may die in service to some grand crusade or pass away in a hospice, either way you will die. was there a political figure or party in history you most associate yourself with?

this should give us an indication of what may be truly at the heart of the issue. we must strive to create a nation worthy of our ancestors, that we give our people the very best lives, and nations that are worthy of them. it was not preached to the crowd, it was not taught by the state. a vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish to enact radical change. yes, beyond all doubt, anti-immigration, anti-ethnic replacement and anti-cultural replacement. what our own nations now based on?

>the time for meekness has long since passed, the time for a political solution has long since passed.