Hmm. I wonder if C before D means…cash before delivery.
You implying a larp?
Well gee, I guess you got me. Pat yourself on the back….I guess. Did you have a point other than the one on top of your head?
Haven't looked at it recently, just went back to look.
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: cbce02 No.7294663 📁
Aug 1 2019 12:22:36 (EST)
[C] before [D].
[C]oats before [D]eclas.
The month of AUGUST is traditionally very HOT.
You have more than you know.
Q
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: cbce02 No.7294663 📁
Aug 1 2019 12:22:36 (EST)
[C] before [D].
[C]oats before [D]eclas.
The month of AUGUST is traditionally very HOT.
You have more than you know.
Q
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 167396 No.9060298 📁
May 6 2020 22:40:16 (EST)
There is a reason why Congress did not return to work this week [DC][non_COVID related].
Think [BOOM] drops this week and next [2019, 2020][+1].
[C]oats before [D]eclas [ongoing_now].
Q
Dan Coats
…Gun laws
On multiple occasions, Coats has supported gun control measures. In 1991, he voted in favor of the Biden-Thurmond Violent Crime Control Act of 1991. This act, which did not become law, would have created a waiting period for handgun purchases and placed a ban on assault weapons.[12] Subsequently, he supported the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act that President Clinton signed into law in 1993.[13] The legislation imposed a waiting period before a handgun could be transferred to an individual by a licensed dealer, importer, or manufacturer. This waiting period ended when the computerized instant check system came online. Coats also supported Feinstein Amendment 1152 to the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1993.[14] The purpose of the Feinstein Amendment was to "restrict the manufacture, transfer, and possession of certain semiautomatic assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices".[15]
Coats with President George W. Bush in January 2006
In April 2013, Coats was one of forty-six senators to vote against passage of a bill which would have expanded background checks for gun buyers. Coats voted with 40 Republicans and five Democrats to stop the passage of the bill.[16]
Not sure about this guy. On one hand, he seems to be a good guy, on the other, he seems to be spoopy, especially in light of things like:
In 2005, Coats drew attention when he was chosen by President George W. Bush to shepherd Harriet Miers's failed nomination to the Supreme Court through the Senate. Echoing Senator Roman Hruska's famous 1970 speech in defense of Harrold Carswell, Coats said to CNN regarding the nomination: "If [being a] great intellectual powerhouse is a qualification to be a member of the court and represent the American people and the wishes of the American people and to interpret the Constitution, then I think we have a court so skewed on the intellectual side that we may not be getting representation of America as a whole."[38]
In 2007, Coats served as co-chairman of a team of lobbyists for Cooper Industries, a Texas corporation that moved its principal place of business to Bermuda, where it would not be liable for U.S. taxes. In that role, he worked to block Senate legislation that would have closed a tax loophole, worth hundreds of millions of dollars to Cooper Industries.[39]
Coats served as co-chairman of the Washington government relations office of King & Spalding.[39]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Coats
Not sure exactly what to think. Could be a wolf in sheeps clothing, or not.
Kind of a stretch but, maybe a Greta link somehow?
You know, despite all the contortions, twists and turns, that the deep state uses, it all really seems to come down to ONE thing…greed. Sure, there may be some people who do things based on their ideology, but in the end, it usually just ends up being greed. Every man has his price seems to be their M.O.
KEK. AOL. Assholes online.