Baker, you missed or ignored a doubleNotablein the last bread at least. The post below gives a nice cap and links to some interesting anon posts from from bread #16660.

>>13083033 (pb) Eyes on, possible Q/insider comms

There is no proof that this is Q, but given the state of this board, the call to re-evaluate Q posts strikes this anon the type of organizing message that Q would come back and post about. Also in the vein of Q, these anonymous suggestions can do no harm, so why not give the [bracketed text] in Q posts another look?

>>13083753

see >>13083033 (lb)

An anon compiled a series of possible insider messages from a prior bread, including one telling us to get organized.

>>13083934

>We've long thought there were posts without the trip or from helpers who didn't have the trip.

Agreed. Sometimes Q seems to post anonymously in order to communicate with other actors (non-anons). In those cases we don't typically get much out of it. In other cases (such as, I suspect, this one) Q has helped anons directly, e.g., I seem to recall that figuring out the clock required some anonymous nudges from Q.

I just wish baker would notable it (I requested a notable in this bread >>13083693), since other anons would probably want to see the posts for themselves.