Anonymous ID: de96d7 March 1, 2021, 11:20 p.m. No.13084473   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4485 >>4493

>>13084465

>Look at the context, he was talking about the vaccine. If you don't want to look at the context then don't, but don't be self-deceived.

You really need to lurk moar. You're not paying attention to detail at a level necessary to understand what is actually going on.

Anonymous ID: de96d7 March 1, 2021, 11:40 p.m. No.13084544   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4548

>>13084539

>Could this be the other way around-a Black Hat prop rather than White Hats dropping clues?

Yep. They like to put what they're doing right in your face. They think it proves that you consent to the things they do to you.

They're criminally insane.

Anonymous ID: de96d7 March 1, 2021, 11:46 p.m. No.13084567   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4579 >>4596

>>13084559

You appear to be too dumb to realize that intelligent, thoughtful anonymous researchers here would never direct people as to how to care for their health when it comes to something as personal (and potentially dangerous) as a vaccine.

Instead, they would say something like "do your own research", "trust in yourself" and "make your own decisions."

But here you are telling everyone to take a specific injection.

Seems like you glow pretty damn brightly.