>>13085419

OR

the peopel were already dead but still being fully paid for by pensions and trusts that would expire upon them dieing.

so they 'pretended' they were still alive for years, voted them, collected their pensions and welfare, and just said that they were alive.

and when COVID happened it was profitible to pretend they were patients, so they 'moved' them to nursing homes (no real people moved) and listed them as dead after a while.

so in that conjecture (which is likely given how corrupt the blue states are) no one murdered, it was just a long term fraud.

which is true?

>>13085470

well, of course, my story is just a theory.

just to present te idea that perhaps it wasn't mass murder.

>>13085489

depopulation.

they don't care what we do as long as we die.

>>13085497

the puppeteers don't care about countries.

they stand apart and above.

so they don't die for their country.

many believe that what the reptile-minded do is pit country against country, and gamble on the casualties.

so your point of view is their point of view.

are you one of them?

>>13085528

this is the answer it should be, no hurt feelings, the anon gets what I am doing.

>>13085523

I know that the rot at the top is a fish rots at the head thing. I try to envision a narrative that might be truthful that explains it as being major fraud, and not murder.

murder by death does always meet Justice, even if we don't know about it.

>>13085567

three times you use the word

compilled

compile

compilitiation

compilly dilly a ding dong

compile compile compulsion

compulsed to pulse in compile.

the faster ti goes, no one knows,

but some times it takes quite a while

compile

in the morning

and just walk away

the contractor charges by the hour

and lives right by the bay

sailing is a life style

they dance along the waves

billing by the hours

24 hours of each day.

compile compile compile

>>13085580

compile the bracket-tatters

compile the should've done anyway

something we (but who says we here?)

should've done anyway.

obviously this is someone's program.

compile it wrong

and send it off

like a bad song

where all the sounds are a cough

OR it's pretending to be that.

oh you never know.

when the narrative you get from a feed is always false . . . in some sense, it might be a precise program

in another sense.

you simply need to know the code

to compile for a while, outside of the vile.

(and redunduendeou)

compile

complete

cough

sounds

send

song good

good song

fetch, song.

most 'music' is just brainwash tries

filled with lies

no one working as a team would need to comm here if they coordinate here but it is quite possible that some do it in full view just to rub the fact into the faces that they imagine are here too.

so some throw eggs in their fan.

it's a futile endevour.

>>13085600

you are wrong

>>13085613

>>13085613

the flaw of the idea of a 'perfect' 'world' flaws the flawed narrative.

it's a typical false-musing of a script bot, or someone pretending to be a quip off the cuff too smart for you commentator who will troll-out fake narrative as commentary, as if, with built in obviously flawed assumptions.

this one pretends to discuss men but ignores women: another intentional flaw in the narrative.

it's a 1980s view of 'women are always the victim, men are always the problem' narrative, an MSM bot from the 1980s joins our compilation.

compiled and completed in vein

the result of the compile

were measurabley insane!

but measured with an obviously flawed narrative . . .

>13085627

jhere we have troll bot: the demonstritively obvious flaw, with an obvious flaw, compiled here for the narrative to keep being ever more flawed, the flow of this flaw is the flaw in the flow of the logic of the ones who fund to a flaw . . .

probably written in either lisp or python, the chances are that it consistes of lists of assumptions.

and those are tagged to lists of 'types'

and those are used to build concompilations of 'bot personas'

the bot personas would have associated content. the content would have various metrics. the 'metric' of what is wanted to effect gets input (INPUTTT STEP ON KNEE) and the decision is pulled out of the dataset of dataset references . . . and voila, a false persona is generated and then trolled through the bread.

trolled and compiled to interact with another similar fake-coction of falsity.

sometimes it's just to amuse a semiperfect person who thinks too highly of them-splaining.

and sometimes it's an effort to draw out the real haters of the . . . . whoever is the group that is paying to find out what kind of wierdos might fester here (they arrived already hating everybody here).

and if it's a bot, and a nonsense spawning confusion assit shill bot, you gotta get to the heart of what it is trying to do.

becuase even though they troll out a heartless creep persona botton-ality (the persona of a 'creep bot' . there is no actual creep, but a troll assist, (not really a shill, more like an operator who is actually deluded enough to think that (or is it really a delusion) that bad people might use this place to comm)

but we all know that bad people do use this place to comm sometimes.

ebot is a real person who desparately wishes he wasn't (a snark?)

the preceeding is stream of compile-siousness automatica

compile compile compile.

>>13085673

as a mental exercise you could bullet list each false assumption of your cry-baby narrative of accusation and ask yourself: why did I believe these false talking points from leftist-splaining people and how they interact?

>>13085568

the circle of fifths is what it is.

>>13085741

throwing eggs in the fan of an obviously scripted part of a bot-pair assist effort of someone using foolishness and obviously flawed assumptions to build a false narrative for the purposes of trolling.

>>13085530

on the field of battle General Patton was , of course, a master.

did he know about the overlords puppeteering nations into war? Perhaps he did.

in his statement that you show he's not talking about what I'm talking about.

I am sure he wishes that all the 'poor dumb bastards' on either side, had a better choice than that which they arrived at.

and thus I can be correc, and so can he, because he means it one way, and I another.

>>13085780

you make up everything you say based upon false assumptions and you never follow anyone else.

everything you state about me is falsity or gaslighting.