>>1317204
Never paid Corsi much mind (post-boomer with book I'd never buy, too old to have "future" to speak of; and best association imo is with AJ, a whole different ball of wax)
Listened to vid last night/today — long-winded, self-important, but I seriously can't tell if it's age and narcissism, or if he just wants in on Patriot movement. I'd have to listen to more vids and honestly he lulls me to sleep.
> He says chans bad, but he's been assraped hard here, and he's right there's a lot of signal/noise ratio here, but from the one vid I saw:
I'm not sure it's bad to question what Q means like Corsi did. (It's actually sort of the point: Q team always said there'd be some disinfo, and not everything is exactly clear).
Many Anons have questioned Sessions; and Q saying "'Trust Sessions'" could mean "Trust Sessions… to be deep state and screw up.'' Is that "wrong think"?
Do we HAVE "wrong think" besides shill commies?
I'd have to know if Corsi asks for shekels for secret private info, and honestly I'm not seeing that but maybe someone can link me up.
Headed to Q questions to ask for clarification because I think Q post intended to tell people not to pay for special access, and shills taking advantage of good intention to make it seem like Q himself is divisionfag (he's not; not that I can tell).
But I think (1) ppl making career out of PG kids' misfortunes is sick, and (2) Q really meant you don't have to send money to get secret Q comms.
> Do either Beanz or Corsi require shekels for secret private (fake) Q comms? Maybe they do and I missed it. Otherwise, I keep ear to ground from many sources (not just online) and maybe both have their roles to play.