>>1373162

LOL that was supposed to be "subtle" communication techniques? I knew exactly what he was implying in the first 6 seconds Stone started talking.

If I literally knew nothing other than:

1. There is an anon guy claiming to be an insider dropping information

2. Here's some guy talking about the anon guy

MAYBE it'd take me the first 17 seconds to know exactly what he was implying. Likely it'd still only take me 6 seconds.

The only sad thing about this division drama is that it's yet another reminder of how utterly stupid the average person is. I really don't know if there's any better word to describe those who are suceptable to these "skillfully asked questions and implied response.". I can't devote any more time at trying to persuade/redpill people or redpill people.I'll help the movement with table-pounding memes and enraging videos.

>>1376938

Still relying on a 2nd hand source when you have access to the 1st. It's like saying you only listen to BBC because they're not American and therefore unbiased.