>>1309530 (prev.)
>always good to have redundancy in different formats, some people like it one way some like it another.
absolutely, thanks
may i suggest adding the MA archives link in your spreadsheet? (sorry if it's there and i missed it) could help with linking/continuity
i repeat myself, but thanks for investing yourself in this mission, our archives are so essential…
OTHER ANONS, SAVE THIS SHIT OFFLINE ONCE IN A WHILE, TOO
from notables:
> >>1308976 Timeline of [15] to [1] confirmation graphic/tweets
hey Markerfags,
the timeline of this one being somewhat cleared up…
This was meant to train us "how to understand the correlation between posts and Tweets", ok.
Definitely seeing the connection, but the subtleties of [15] vs [1], i can't say i fully get.
Anyone want to give their take on it?
>IMPORTANT:
>Do you understand what just occurred?
>POTUS Tweets [15 min] between.
>POTUS missing "Q" in select word.
>DEFCON [1] POST HERE
>POTUS mods Tweets [1 min] between.
>POTUS adds "Q" in select word.
>This was not meant to signify AUTH / established.
>This is to train you how to understand the correlation between posts and Tweets.
>Future proves past.
>Wind the CLOCK.
>The CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are ESSENTIAL.
>Feel privileged - POTUS just spoke to this board [P_pers]
vWe serve at the pleasure of the President.
>Q
>Graphic form for each correlation a MUST.
>This will be the AUTH tool you use when all of this becomes public to provide friends, family, others.
>Do you think POTUS re-tweeted MAGA PILL for no reason?
>We chose this BOARD for a very specific reason.
>We believe in you.
>Q
resurch moar
https://www.privacyend.com/five-eyes-intelligence-alliance/
The Five Eyes Intelligence Alliance
The Five Eyes intelligence alliance is a secretive coalition and surveillance arrangement of countries internationally which include the United States National Security Agency (NSA), Canada’s Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC), the United Kingdom’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), New Zealand’s Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) and the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD).
A series of bilateral agreements were developed in the beginning of 1946 by an alliance of five English-speaking countries over a period of time and became to known as the UKUSA agreement. This agreement established the Five Eyes alliance to share intelligence especially signals intelligence (SIGINT).
These five English-speaking countries for almost 70 years have been involved in the global surveillance spying on the communications all over the world and build an infrastructure to master the internet for surveillance.
What does the Five Eyes agreement states?
The agreements amongst the Five countries are not known despite being 70 years old. A very little information about the agreements between the Five Eyes countries is present in the books of history and usually references become the part of intelligence agency reporting. Also, limited information about what exactly the arrangement comprises the services themselves.
>Where would we be without accurate records of all of this? That's what I ask myself.
indeed…
>keeping the records, clear, complete and accurate in different formats, gives anons and normalfags multiple resources to make their own side-by-sides or other graphics
absolutely… actually, seeing some of Q's latest /patriotsfight/ caps, i have to admit i thought "hm, maybe we should have a gallery with every Q post in good/high quality caps available", help Q team out as well
>What a team, I'm so humbled and honored to be able to serve with such great people from around the world in this little way
likewise, fellow anons/autists/humans/Patriots
>Doubt much is making it to notables
make a recap post, telling the story, links/pics if available, one good post consolidated is better than a series of posts
off grid, farming, health cures, all those subjects could make for a good Dedicated Thread, though.
you could go deeper and share/archive useful resources without sliding the general
>actual native screenshots
same. i like the pub caps for memeing Q, because the format&colors edit/blend in more easily, but as archives, the source itself should be obvious… also see EST as being the established standard from the start.
>Does that help?
hellyeah, that's beautiful.
Watchers, go grab all this for Q, so he can whip out any one of his posts as needed without having to go through it all again… archivers got his back :P
oh, sweet, i can probly help. what are you unsure about?
basically posting like here, you just need to know the ritual… i work with notepad++, 4tabs for each part, another for the whole for the pastebin, editing/copypasting pieces as needed.
For the notables, we tried a new recipe the other day, it was going pretty fast and another anon took charge of notables completely, posting near the end of thread, it worked beautifully.
i do as follows:
-get pastebin, open in Notepad++
-have 5 files: dough1, 2, 3, 4, paste1642
-open 2 catalog tabs, one for pastebin newpaste ready
-catalogtab1, create new thread, paste section1
-quadruplecheck the number & name (Subject field) of the thread
-post… often it cycles at 100% but doesn't finish, that is why the 2nd catalog tab
refresh, until new bread appears (not very long, usually, but sometimes needs 2 refreshes)
-then go in your bread, can close the other tab no problem, post sections 2,3,4, copy all that to the new pastebin
-paste that link to archive/hand-off dough
-tag your first post/link to bread, prepare your NEW BREAD post
-don't post it too soon, because anons then just go
fill
fill
fill
and that SUCKS.
oh, and the timing, that's a bit tricky. If not too fast can wait around 700, but starting baking, go earlier, around 650, to be safe.
any other questions?
>practice a bit more.
ok, make tests in comms as needed to see how it works - it's stressful taking the bake at first, but the pressure's all in your head, it's not much more complicated than posting a reply with a pic here or making a thread.
so do you think you'll be back in time for this bread, or i should take it and you have the next?
>There were no crumbs on FIVE-EYES to 're_read'.
Just because it's not explicitly mentioned doesn't mean crumbs don't apply…
When talking of related or direct same subject matter, the reference is there without saying it - a big part of the whole point of re-reading crumbs multiple times, with added insight and hindsight.
>>1309977 thanks doubledubs
notablesofar?
>>1309924 White House considers restricting Chinese researchers over espionage fears
>>1309913 NXIVM donations to Clinton Campaign/Members of Clinton Global Initiative
>>1309894 NXIVM doctor charged with conducting human experiments (understatement)
>>1309722 James Comey Just Lost Two of His Closest Allies at the FBI: James Baker and Lisa Page
>>1309591 Wall Street Should be Worried About Justice Department Report
>>1309548 Pre_stage_y
>>1310029 thanks
#1642
>>1309924 White House considers restricting Chinese researchers over espionage fears
>>1309913 NXIVM donations to Clinton Campaign/Members of Clinton Global Initiative
>>1309894 NXIVM doctor charged with conducting human experiments (understatement)
>>1309722 James Comey Just Lost Two of His Closest Allies at the FBI: James Baker and Lisa Page
>>1309591 Wall Street Should be Worried About Justice Department Report
>>1309587 , >>1309439 , >>1309539 and possible $22 Singapore connection
>>1309579 Koreas synchronize clocks
>>1309573 Zarif's son best man at JK's daughter wedding
>>1309548 Pre_stage_y: Anon decodes Q 'Pre_stage ele_y' post (opinion)
>>1309547 Iran Foreign Minister Zarif vows not to renegotiate
>>1309756 >Only then can you post.
they are linked, reposted, capped by anons here, it'll be hard to miss, don't worry
-it's another thread on the same board, not hidden
-it shouldn't be news to any anon anyway
-anons who despite all sense want to go on about it are welcome to do so in their own space, not censored or prevented from doing whatever the fuck they want to do
>Please reply
i see you, it's ok.
please use less spacing, learn to condense/format moar pliz
true, but then point that out, don't say ZERO, you're disproving yourself