this time can not be relied on for a beginning of the rebellion, only utilized as a final stage of energy and escalation to finalize our capture of power. ngos are traitor organizations if you lose history will write you as monsters, regardless of your tactics.win first, write the narrative later. more often than not these ngos hide their true intentions behind a facade of religiosity and only once you investigate into the leadership and governance of the ngo itself do you find the people running the show are in fact far from religious themselves and more often than not are actually atheistic cultural marxists using naive christian europeans to both labour and fund fund their own attempt at class and racial warfare. show them the way forward there is no sheltered meadow there is nowhere left to run, turn around, face your enemy, make your stand. anyone can be a member of our nation, as long as they have the paperwork. until the hagia sophia is free of the minarets, the men of europe are men in name only the rape of european women invaders many of you may already know about the rape of british women by the invading forces, rotherham of course being the most well known case. were/are you a conservative? a a one-point-seven percentage point difference may mean something to a few, but a ingeniously worded expression or brilliantly crafted poster will convince the many. though i will have to disavow some of her beliefs, the extreme actions she calls for are too much, even for my tastes. the more diverse a group becomes, the less equal it becomes. i can not guarantee my success.

crush these traitor ngos, kill their leadership, burn down their buildings, bomb their ships, tear down their posters and destroy their membership. the nation? as a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? and what can we do to stop it? “ we are disgraced, sons and brothers, who live in these days of calamities! drug use at all levels of society, in all age groups, any source of distraction or relief to escape a culture of nihilism.

>by the definition, then yes.