that isn ’ t a question. was the attack “ xenophobic ” in orgin? focusing on increasing the population of whites, or trying to gain economic wealth or military might, whilst already having met the requirement of numbers, wealth and military force needed is simply a stalling tactic, spoken and put forth by men too cowardly to do what is required. there is no nation in the world that wasn ’ t founded by, or maintained by, the use of force. more skilled and courageous? the worth of your life is not measured by the length of your life, but your actions during it. to agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to over extend their own hand and experience the eventual backlash. the people who are to blame most are ourselves, european men. with risk comes possibilities, with possibilites comes chance for victory destabilization and accelerationism: tactics for victory true change and the change we need to enact only arises in the great crucible of crisis. each nation and each ethnicity was melded by their own environment and if they are to be protected so must their own environments. more skilled and courageous?

this rapid change in demography will bring about a time of crisis, as the reality of our possible ethnic replacement becomes obvious to all, even the naysayers. do not fret on the manner of how victory is achieved, all methods are possible, in the face of ethnic genocide, all morality is ambiguous. why is it that what gives western nations strength (diversity) is not what gives eastern nations (china, japan, taiwan, south korea) their strength? were you taught violence and extremism by video games, music, literature, cinema? ethnic autonomy for all peoples with a focus on the preservation of nature, and the natural order. expect death, expect struggle, expect loss that you will never forget.

>that difference was ebba akerlund.