new zealand was not the original choice for attack, i only arrived to new zealand to live temporarily whilst i planned and trained, but i soon found out that new zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the west. states hate other states, the electoral college is under attack at every turn and the races are at each others throats. to incite violence, retaliation and further divide between the european people and the invaders currently occupying european soil. give your everything to your people. to take revenge for ebba akerlund. but what few know is that rotherham is just one of an ongoing trend of rape and molestation perpetrated by these non-white scum. so yes. ebba was partially deaf, unable to hear the attacker coming. all else is dishonorable. this is a tactic practiced not only on the french people, but on all the peoples of europe, effectively destroying the nations identity at its core and smashing apart all bonds which a successful, unified nation is built upon. were/are you a christian?

not by the maneuvers of the lobbies and the parliaments and the congresses, it will come under the stress of necessity. why were we allowing the invaders to conquer us? the truth is that eventually people must face the fact that it wasn ’ t a damn thing to do with the economy.that it was the british people firing back at mass immigration, cultural displacement and globalism, and that ’ s a great and wonderful thing. incite conflict.place posters near public parks calling for sharia law, then in the next week place posters over such posters calling for the expulsion of all immigrants, repeat in every area of public life until the crisis arises. it is far better to encourage radical, violent change regardless of its origins. was the attack anti-immigration in origin?