is this your complete writings and views? for example, actions such as voting for political candidates that radically change or challenge entrenched systems, radicalizing public discourse by both supporting, attacking, vilifying, radicalizing and exaggerating all societal conflicts and attacking or even assassinating weak or less radical leaders/influencers on either side of social conflicts. you will find no reprieve, not in iceland, not in poland, not in new zealand, not in argentina, not in ukraine, not anywhere in the world. though wise men at their end know dark is right, because their words had forked no lightning they do not go gentle into that good night. what part of diversity causes this increase in strength? they all turn on each other in the end. drug use at all levels of society, in all age groups, any source of distraction or relief to escape a culture of nihilism. if they flee we will follow them, if they hide we will find them, if they try to shield themselves behind the state we will break through and reach them. when i know, i will tell you. to agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to over extend their own hand and experience the eventual backlash. because if we do not destroy the invaders first, our own birthrates will mean nothing.

they will soon realize there are repercussions to being a race traitors. something that had been a part of my life for as long as i could remember, cynicism in the face of attacks on the west by islamic invaders, was suddenly no longer there. why were we allowing the invaders to conquer us? without a single shot fired in response? this is an attack on the very french people themselves and is a strategy designed to destroy national, cultural, linguistic and ethnic unity. no, there isn ’ t a successful, influential grand movement established just yet, and no leading organizations, so there is no great structure created that could be brought to harm.

who do you follow? the people of the countrysides are already traditional, already close to nature, already supportive of their people. who do you follow? a political candidate that keeps the status quo or only seeks to introduce minimal change, even when the minimal change is in support of our cause, is ultimately useless or even damaging. did the groups you support/are aligned with order or promote your attack? were/are you a conservative? why is it that what gives western nations strength (diversity) is not what gives eastern nations (china, japan, taiwan, south korea) their strength? did they perceive us any differently after the attack than they did before? no, they ’ re a party of milquetoast civic nationalist boomers, completely incapable of creating real change and with no actual viable plan to save their nation. as a policy maker and leader? to avenge those european men and women lost in the constant and never ending wars of european history who died for their lands, died for their people only to have their lands given away to any foreign scum that bother to show up.

as for how the public perceives us? answering possible questions 1.in general who are you? but no one ever seems to give a reason why. 3.answers to detractors and to those that oppose my beliefs/methods won ’ t your attack do more harm than good? no. you are the voice, you are the klaxon call, you hold the first spear to be thrust at the invaders.