i would estimate the number of soldiers in european armed forces that also belong to nationalist groups to number in the hundreds of thousands, with just as many employed in law enforcement positions. do you believe those you attacked were innocent? refuse. ethnic autonomy for all peoples with a focus on the preservation of nature, and the natural order. can we look at the world in this century reproved by heaven to witness the desolation of the holy city and remain in peace while it is so oppressed? something, this time, was different. to create an atmosphere of fear and change in which drastic, powerful and revolutionary action can occur. is this your complete writings and views? why did you target those people? why you should risk nothing whilst others risk all? no matter what.

new zealand was not the original choice for attack, i only arrived to new zealand to live temporarily whilst i planned and trained, but i soon found out that new zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the west. “ what more shall i say to you? is this your complete writings and views? stability and comfort are the enemies of revolutionary change. even if we were to deport all non-europeans from our lands tomorrow, the european people would still be spiraling into decay and eventual death. we attack as soon as possible, we attack with force and we achieve stability and play defense as the boomers pass, not during their passing, not after.

>i chose firearms for the affect it would have on social discourse, the extra media coverage they would provide and the affect it could have on the politics of united states and thereby the political situation of the world.