how is this possible? why attack immigrants when “ x ” are the issue? they aren ’ t going to ethnically replace the people, nor change the nations culture.they are the same people, they are the same culture. there is no nation in the world that wasn ’ t founded by, or maintained by, the use of force. on top of this is a two party political system, split by racial, social, cultural, linguistic and class divides. support them physically, be ready to put boots on the ground, send them weapons and munitions, attack their enemies. if you believe we need to correct the white birth rates, why didn ’ t you start a family and do it yourself? if a an individual is in ownership or control of a corporation or business, and advocates or even accepts the mass importation of non-whites to replace the native european populations, then that traitor must be destroyed. do you consider it a terrorist attack? it was not preached to the crowd, it was not taught by the state. in every french city, in every french town the invaders were there.
unsurprisingly ethno-nationalists and nationalists seek employment in areas that serve their nations and community. i don ’ t, but i may have some. but here ’ s the real kicker, the unarmed invader is far more dangerous to our people than the armed invader. finally i would like to send a message to the perpetrators of these attacks, and their families. yes, predominantly an ethno-nationalist (i place importance on the health and well being of my race above all else). my parents are of scottish, irish and english stock.
>beyond this place of wrath and tears looms but the horror of the shade, and yet the menace of the years finds and shall find me unafraid.