a political candidate that keeps the status quo or only seeks to introduce minimal change, even when the minimal change is in support of our cause, is ultimately useless or even damaging. who do you follow? they had long since lost their cities, take a look at auckland. why should others fight for you if you are not willing to fight for yourself? crush these traitor ngos, kill their leadership, burn down their buildings, bomb their ships, tear down their posters and destroy their membership. i remember pulling into a shopping centre car park to buy groceries in some moderate sized town in eastern france, of roughly 15-25 thousand people. though i did contact the reborn knights templar for a blessing in support of the attack, which was given. no, conservatism is corporatism in disguise, i want no part of it. it was not preached to the crowd, it was not taught by the state. more often than not these ngos hide their true intentions behind a facade of religiosity and only once you investigate into the leadership and governance of the ngo itself do you find the people running the show are in fact far from religious themselves and more often than not are actually atheistic cultural marxists using naive christian europeans to both labour and fund fund their own attempt at class and racial warfare. was the attack anti-immigration in origin?

the idea that a frenchmen need not speak the language, share the culture, believe in the same god or even more importantly be ethnically french is ludicrous in the extreme. after all i am a private and mostly introverted person. meanwhile they badger, trick and guilt-shame the european people into forfeiting their own hard earned income and giving it directly to their peoples cultural and ethnic competitors, many of which have the only intent of conquering and destroying the european peoples. what are your wishes? embrace infamy: the enemies of your people will beset upon you, on all sides. few have done more to damage and racially cleanse europe of its people.