to create an atmosphere of fear and change in which drastic, powerful and revolutionary action can occur. somehow this isolation then radicalization is seen as a surprise, yet for anyone who was paying attention, it was a long time coming. leave no vipers nest unburnt don ’ t leave the cities, run towards the fight, not away run towards the cities, run towards the conflict, run towards the enemy, fleeing from the enemy is cowardice. kidding, but australian is a european colony, particularly of british stock and thereby an extension of europe. to incite violence, retaliation and further divide between the european people and the invaders currently occupying european soil. all else is insufficient. the cheaper labour and ignorance of environmental health will always result in cheaper goods produced with less effort and inevitably result in control of the market. europa rises they grow up and take the potential homes of your own people for themselves, they occupy positions of power, remove wealth and destroy social trust. do not fear change, we are change globalized capitalist markets are the enemy of racial autonomists if an ethnocentric european future is to be achieved global free markets and the trade of goods is to be discouraged at all costs. with risk comes possibilities, with possibilites comes chance for victory destabilization and accelerationism: tactics for victory true change and the change we need to enact only arises in the great crucible of crisis.

was the attack “ xenophobic ” in orgin? no, but the next person to attack could be, so a healthy scepticism is a good thing. its the cities where the struggle lies, its the cities where the invaders have massed, its the cities where the marxists have poisoned the institutions, its the cities where the traitorous media and corporations lie and its the cities where the anti-white politicians and the ngos make their homes. no matter if it takes 3 years or 30 years, these people must pay for their disgusting attacks upon our race. why not me? was there a political figure or party in history you most associate yourself with?

>answering possible questions 1.in general who are you?