sure. why were we allowing these soldiers deaths to be in vain? also, relying on this time period for our victory holds a second major disadvantage, that being vulnerability to foreign invasion, most likely from the east, specifically china; turkey; india or some combination of the three. the candidates were an obvious sign of our times: a globalist, capitalist, egalitarian, an ex-investment banker was no national beliefs other than the pursuit of profit versus a milquetoast, feckless, civic nationalist, an uncontroversial figure who ’ s most brave and inspired idea resolved to the possible deportation of illegal immigrants. unsurprisingly ethno-nationalists and nationalists seek employment in areas that serve their nations and community. you will risk, struggle, strive, drive, stumble, fall, crawl, charge and perspire, all in the name of victory. in time, the truth will be revealed. but it will take take some time, time we do not have due to the crisis of mass immigration. they removed the europeans peoples autonomy and sovereignty for their own lust for power and wealth. prepare for war, prepare for violence and prepare for risk, loss, struggle, death. without overwhelming effort and extreme risk, expect nothing.
millions of invaders landing on our shores, conquering our towns and without a single shot fired in response. is there a particular person that radicalized you the most? that is a very broad category of people, and the definition is fuzzy at best. i begun planning an attack roughly two years in advance and an attack at the location in christchurch three months in advance. these ngo ’ s are the modern money changers inside the church, and must be driven out, by voice or by whip. was the attack “ racist ” in origin?
>but for some reason this was different.