only for muslims. destroyed in the name of cheap labour, whilst they may publicly object to the illegal immigration of the third world masses, privately they push for as much migration as possible, anything to decrease the labour cost of production and line their pockets with the profits. millions of invaders landing on our shores, conquering our towns and without a single shot fired in response. to take revenge on the invaders for the hundreds of thousands of deaths caused by foreign invaders in european lands throughout history. sure. they built homes for their children to live in, they built communities for their people to thrive in, they built nations for their people to survive in. survival was a better alternative to death in order to further spread my ideals by media coverage and to deplete resources from the state by my own imprisonment. what do you want? those that are ethnically and culturally european. not a thing has been conserved other than corporate profits and the the ever increasing wealth of the 1 % that exploit the people for their own benefit. ethnic autonomy?
no, carrying out an attack for fame would be laughable.after all who can remember the name of the attackers in the september 11 attack in new york? how about the attack on the pentagon? after an election cycle or two with certain democratic victory, those remaining, non democratic voting, non brainwashed whites will see the future clear before them, and with this knowledge realize the impossibility of a diplomatic or political victory. all else is dishonorable. when i know, i will tell you. these repercussions will hit them hard, fast and without mercy. but here ’ s the real kicker, the unarmed invader is far more dangerous to our people than the armed invader.
>history is the history of power.