the final push was witnessing the state of french cities and towns. meanwhile they badger, trick and guilt-shame the european people into forfeiting their own hard earned income and giving it directly to their peoples cultural and ethnic competitors, many of which have the only intent of conquering and destroying the european peoples. as a policy maker and leader? the unarmed invader is more dangerous that the armed the lightning march through the institutions while the lefts march through the institutions was long and ultimately successful we must achieve the same, but in a much shorter time period. for too long we have allowed the left to co-opt the environmentalist movement to serve their own needs. meanwhile the 10000 ton boulder of demographic change rolls ever forward, gaining momentum and possibly destroying all in its path. why not me? that perverse nation profanes the hospices … the temple of the lord is treated like a criminal and the ornaments of the sanctuary are robbed. c. what the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? why is that their non diverse nations do so much better than our own, and on so many different metrics? we must inevitably correct the disaster of hedonistic, nihilistic individualism.

rage, rage against the dying of the light. if convicted, do you expect to stay in prison? to avenge those european men and women lost in the constant and never ending wars of european history who died for their lands, died for their people only to have their lands given away to any foreign scum that bother to show up. as a policy maker and leader? was there a particular event or reason you decided to commit to a violent attack? and how does diversity increase that strength?

>meanwhile the 10000 ton boulder of demographic change rolls ever forward, gaining momentum and possibly destroying all in its path.