>>13102281
>>13102290
Anon,
The inorganic (and recently insider) attacks should have been much more of a sign than anything else. Yes, it's rare to find anyone pointing readers to the real discussions on this site and others about the real happenings, but attempts have been made for certain. Look at 8bit's thread as an example. At any rate, I'm not sure what you want to make of the current situation, but many anons seem to have missed the play from the start with Q drops that focused on how to get the message out to the public.
Anons were brought here at the behest of some already organized anons that were coordinating a way to best organize the grift that we've witnessed for years. Anons fighting anons over which slide was just a slide, bullshit about Adrenochrome and Schumann, all the while, an entire DW filled with links directly to the subject matter that most anons came here to fight against and not one Q post recognizing those sites or their actual existence. No, seriously; if you have intel that leads to verifiable proof that a certain subset of these people really are cannibals/pedos, why link to an obvious bullshit FB page that mocks it as "art"? Q's explanation for that was actually the weakest of all the drops, but I digressโฆ
I mean, could you imagine being an avid anon researching this shit, and then you come across it? Now you have a situation where you can't report it because everyone's fucking pozzed, yet you were tracked by ABCs the whole time. You can't even plea it was citizen journalism because persona that gave you the courage to peek behind the curtain vehemently denies the existence of said persona so there's no "I got your back, fam" to save you from getting put into a jail cell with Bubbah, The Deliverer of Prolapsed Anuses.
An ideological rift has been boiling this whole time, and every good grifter plays the patience game. We don't even know if Jim knew about November ahead of time (oh wait, we do actually). Ok, well, we may never know all the details about why Jim was pointed at as a "safe bet" to host this effort outside of that fact that he used to wear a mantle of "Free Speech Absolutist"; or at least he implied that he did. Now, regardless of whether you agree with Fredrick Brennan or not, it's become apparent that the outward display of "FUCK YOU, JIM" from folks like Brennan and his followers on twitter is actually based in some disagreements that happened years ago and festered to a boiling point, presently. On the flip side, an uneasy (and often not seen) background "alliance" is obvious as these people no longer engage in the sort of, um, "behavior" that made them popular with all sorts of "cool kids" from back in the day that frequented certain boards that used to exist here. From that point forward in "internet history", any pages/sites/boards hosting/displaying such content should have been considered "no go" zones outside of the fact that glowies all hang out in them for obvious reasons. Hell, even 4chan's /b/ has a dedicated archival solution that behaves extremely questionably when clicking around/investigating.
>Ahem. Honeypots, anyone?