One can not exist with the other. So yes. No, I spent many years travelling through many, many nations. Those that are ethnically and culturally European. A ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. One can not exist with the other. The notion of a racial future or destiny is as foreign to them as social responsibilities. That means those that can, or have the ability should look to ingrain themselves into these institutions and climb as far up the power hierarchy as possible, in the shortest time possible. Humans are emotional, they are driven by emotions, guided by emotions and seek emotion expressions and experiences. From where did you receive/research/develop your beliefs? A vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish to enact radical change.

This is an attack on the very french people themselves and is a strategy designed to destroy national, cultural, linguistic and ethnic unity. Who decided to take a stand to ensure a future for my people. A political candidate that keeps the status quo or only seeks to introduce minimal change, even when the minimal change is in support of our cause, is ultimately useless or even damaging. In this hell the individual is all and the race is worthless, something to rail against and use whenever possible, a power structure to climb, or topple. The time for meekness has long since passed, the time for a political solution has long since passed. The Europe of the future is not one of concrete and steel, smog and wires but a place of forests, lakes, mountains and meadows.