Anonymous ID: 6f15f6 March 4, 2021, 9:42 p.m. No.13107236   🗄️.is 🔗kun

What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations

↻ ↑ 5 posts

Jun 28 2020

A person(s) value:

  1. vote

  2. monetary value (tax contribution)

Why is 'free thought' ridiculed, challenged, and threatened when a person is opposed to the 'mainstream-narrative'?

[2] remains fixed (degree allowable by 'economic recession/expansion')

[1] remains a variable

[1] dependent on a 'controlled' system of information dissemination

What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?

What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?

What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?

What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?

What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?

What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?

Fact becomes fiction?

Fiction becomes fact?

When does news become propaganda?

Identity creation?

How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?

Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?

Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?

‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].

[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]

Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?

Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?

Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?

Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?

Threat to intellectual freedom?

Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?

Read again – digest.

Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?

THINK BLM PUSH EVERY 4-YEARS.

Logical thinking.

Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’?

How much of the population still believes POTUS colluded w/ RUSSIA due to MSDNC 365-blitz?

No MSDNC retraction of POTUS_RUSSIA collusion narrative [propaganda]? _why?

Pre/post 2016 election?

Why were[are] violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded and allowed to operate within [D] controlled cities [safe-zones]?

Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?

Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?

Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]?

When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.

Control of the narrative = power

When you are blind, what do you see?

They want you divided.

Divided by religion.

Divided by race.

Divided by sex.

Divided by political affiliation.

Divided by class.

When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].

Divided you are weak.

Divided you pose no threat to their control.

When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].

When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.

"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.

THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Anonymous ID: 6f15f6 March 4, 2021, 9:52 p.m. No.13107258   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Did 'Mueller' open the door to Ukraine?

Did 'Mueller' open the door to FISA [illegal]?

How do you introduce evidence legally?

Did 'Impeachment' provide a platform to discuss findings of Ukraine?

How do you introduce evidence legally?

Did 'Impeachment' harm or help POTUS [public]?

How do you introduce [D]s high crimes [corruption] to the public?

Why didn't POTUS remove [Hussein] holdovers from NSC?

Do you really believe that POTUS & team trusted [Hussein] holdovers to remain within the admin and work to enact POTUS' agenda w/o bias or confrontation?

How do you 'awaken' the 'induced coma' public [FAKE NEWS control] from their long sleep?

Sometimes allowing your enemies to [openly] attack…….

Logical thinking.

Anonymous ID: 6f15f6 March 4, 2021, 9:57 p.m. No.13107272   🗄️.is 🔗kun

CHINA

 

“Key domestic contacts for phase one target projects.”

Harris, D-Calif.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo, D-N.Y

Mayor Bill de Blasio, D-N.Y.C

former Virginia Gov. Terry McCauliffe, among others.

Pandora's 'political elite' box?

Anonymous ID: 6f15f6 March 4, 2021, 10:01 p.m. No.13107276   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This is not going away.

Corruption at highest levels of gov.

DOJ_FBI_MSDNC 'political elite' protection struggles during BRIGHT SUNNY days.

 

FBI can no longer attempt to shelter [protect] the Biden's?

Public awareness kills all protections.

 

Why is the FBI's top child porn lawyer involved in the H. Biden laptop case? [special agent Joshua Wilson]

Do you see a pattern?

 

Ukraine, China, Iraq, Iran, …… opens the door far beyond the BIDEN family.

How do you protect your interests [shelter from prosecution _public awareness]?

Control [infiltrate] DOJ, FBI, State, Intel, News, ……..?

How many fired FBI [Russia _Midyear] received a book deal?

Book deals can be lucrative.

Follow the family.

US taxpayer(s) paid for it all.

INFORMATION WARFARE.

Anonymous ID: 6f15f6 March 4, 2021, 10:07 p.m. No.13107290   🗄️.is 🔗kun

What happens if CIA was actively involved in domestic targeting and surv of US person(s) [direct _indirect]?

How does one agency attach itself to another?

"the CIA is restricted in the collection of intelligence information directed against US citizens. Collection is allowed only for an authorized intelligence purpose; for example, if there is a reason to believe that an individual is involved in espionage or international terrorist activities. The CIA's procedures require senior approval for any such collection that is allowed, and, depending on the collection technique employed, the sanction of the Director of National Intelligence and Attorney General may be required."

Look here: FBI

Look here: DOJ

DO NOT LOOK HERE: CIA

Anonymous ID: 6f15f6 March 4, 2021, 10:12 p.m. No.13107303   🗄️.is 🔗kun

How close did we come to losing it?

What if she got in?

What if she got (3+) SC Justice(s)?

What if she got 300+ Judges?

What if rogue elements remained [+ more added] within FBI, CIA, NSA, State, DNI, WH, IRS, DHS, ICE, WHO, CDC, ……..?

What if our MIL remained financially starved?

What if [F]oreign backers continued to control America's policies?

What if our borders remained open?

What if China was given the keys?

What if ………?

This is not about R vs D.

 

Some believe the protection of Agency is what matters most. [Clowns]

Some believe the declassification [public exposure of truth] and rebuilding of Agency is what matters most.

Apply same to FBI.

Apply same to State.

………

Any attempt to buck the system, no matter severity of crime, and they will fight back [self-preservation].

SHADOW GAME.

Prevent public exposure of truth.

Why?

PEOPLE [UNITED] HAVE THE POWER.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.