the truth that the west killed the notion of god, and proceeded to replace it with nothing. all else is dishonorable. it is due to a lack of will. the weaker we become the more immigrants will refuse to join us, refuse to partake in the cultural suicide that we extol. yes, but death was a definite possibility. as we speak i am contacting my secret network of spies across the usa and your ip is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot.

the europe of the future is not one of concrete and steel, smog and wires but a place of forests, lakes, mountains and meadows. above all, just don ’ t be stale, placid and boring. what do you want? yes, though not for an official policy made. this solution of a democratic salvation is nothing but a pipe dream, and as our enemies increase within our lands, driven by mass immigration and the invaders own higher birth rate it will be pushed further and further into the realms of impossibility. rampant urbanization and industrialization, ever expanding cities and shrinking forests, a complete removal of man from nature, with the obvious results.

to ensure the existence of our people and a future for white children, whilst preserving and exulting nature and the natural order. with risk comes possibilities, with possibilites comes chance for victory destabilization and accelerationism: tactics for victory true change and the change we need to enact only arises in the great crucible of crisis. europe is only europe because of its combined genetic, cultural and linguistic heritage. -altered version of “ the beginnings ” by rudyard kipling to conservatives ask yourself, truly, what has modern conservatism managed to conserve? to take revenge for the thousands of european lives lost to terror attacks throughout european lands. support them physically, be ready to put boots on the ground, send them weapons and munitions, attack their enemies.

refuse. we must thrive, we must march ever forward to our place among the stars and we will reach the destiny our people deserve. venerate the ancestors but work for the children a soldiers fight the ideal of a heroic war, without loss, without failure, without some great setback, is idealistic and downright impossible. diversity is anathema to equality. the movement may begin in poland, austria, france, argentina, australia, canada or even venezuela, but the movement will begin and when it does, be ready to throw your weight behind your people, with full force. i will be forgotten quickly.

>this pakistani muslim invader now sits as representative for the people of london.

what remains? it was another terror attack in the seemingly never ending attacks that had been occurring on a regular basis throughout my adult life. you burn the nest and kill the vipers, no matter their age. sure. they built homes for their children to live in, they built communities for their people to thrive in, they built nations for their people to survive in. create memes, post memes, and spread memes.

all else is dishonorable. likely a new society will need to be created with a much greater focus on family values, gender and social norms and the value and importance of nature, culture and race. venerate the ancestors but work for the children a soldiers fight the ideal of a heroic war, without loss, without failure, without some great setback, is idealistic and downright impossible. perhaps you could tap out, lay down, lick the boots of your occupiers and pray they will let you be comfortable, if only for a little while. no, people will forget my motivations quickly and only remember the attack itself. but i believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force.

but the only way to get to the final destination, total victory, is to get up and keep marching forward. millions of people pouring across our borders, legally.invited by the state and corporate entities to replace the white people who have failed to reproduce, failed to create the cheap labour, new consumers and tax base that the corporations and states need to thrive. why did you carry out the attack? expect a soldiers fight and a soldiers death the danger of the invader if you were to kill sixty armed invaders having shown the will and the intent to bring harm to your nation and people, you would be hailed a hero, given your nations highest civilian honours, paraded before the media and the adoring public. just do not allow your scepticism to turn to paranoia and keep you from supporting those that want the best for you. is it not preferable to die in war rather than suffer any longer so horrible a spectacle?

which i do not mind. was there any reason you attacked that (those) mosque (s) in particular? driving toward the next french town on my itinerary, knowing that inevitably the invaders would also been there, i found my emotions swinging between fuming rage and suffocating despair at the indignity of the invasion of france, the pessimism of the french people, the loss of culture and identity and the farce of the political solutions offered. i am just a regular white man, from a regular family. secondly an attack in new zealand would bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilization, that no where in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world and that there was no where left to go that was safe and free from mass immigration. the idea that a frenchmen need not speak the language, share the culture, believe in the same god or even more importantly be ethnically french is ludicrous in the extreme.