it is far better to encourage radical, violent change regardless of its origins. both would seek to destroy our nation, both would seek to displace and replace our people, both would seek to destroy our culture and nationhood. do not fret on the manner of how victory is achieved, all methods are possible, in the face of ethnic genocide, all morality is ambiguous. it was there i decided to do something, it was there i decided to take action, to commit to force.to commit to violence. were/are you a fascist? they will soon realize there are repercussions to being a race traitors. no one can give an answer. lobby those in power to show your support, protest outside embassies of those nations that do not support the nation, and if need be attack them. every human is worth only their own value, no more or less. inaction will lead to sure defeat. our present comfortable, privileged and prosperous life was gifted to us by our forebears, with the belief that we would maintain, cherish and even expand upon their work, so that one day our own children can enjoy the rewards of our labour.

i mostly agree with sir oswald mosley ’ s views and consider myself an eco-fascist by nature. this wealth and prosperity was paid for in the sweat and blood of your ancestors. violence isn ’ t the answer, why are you using force? it ’ s the birthrates. though wise men at their end know dark is right, because their words had forked no lightning they do not go gentle into that good night. finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the united states on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the united states.this conflict over the 2 nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the us along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines.

>why did you target those people?