yes, but death was a definite possibility. these men would stall and delay any action indefinitely, until all necessary action has been undertaken by some other, more courageous man. by the definition, then yes. no, the attack was not an attack on diversity, but an attack in the name of diversity. kill the invaders, kill the overpopulation and by doing so save the environment. grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay, rage, rage against the dying of the light. they removed the europeans peoples autonomy and sovereignty for their own lust for power and wealth. finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the united states on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the united states.this conflict over the 2 nd amendment and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the us along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines. merkel, the mother of all things anti-white and anti-germanic, is top of the list. stop running, start fighting emotions rule over facts stop trying to persuade the general population with statistics, charts, tablets and figures. we must crush immigration and deport those invaders already living on our soil.

no one person in particular, i support many groups but i am a member of none. what does it seek to conserve? paint, write, sing, dance, recite poetry. people are finding their way home. i could have chosen any weapons or means.a tatp filled rental van. diversity by its very definition belies equality.