due to the threat of ethnic replacement and our own horribly low birth rates, we do not have 150 years or even 50 years to achieve positions of power. therefore, once we show them the risk of bringing their offspring to our soil, they will avoid our lands. to see this in full effect, you only have to look at the population statistics in western nations for the year 2100. https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of_countries_by_future_population_ (u nited_nations, _medium_fertility_variant) in 2100, despite the ongoing effect of sub-replacement fertility, the population figures show that the population does not decrease inline with the sub-replacement fertility levels, but actually maintains and, even in many white nations, rapidly increases. no, they ’ re a party of milquetoast civic nationalist boomers, completely incapable of creating real change and with no actual viable plan to save their nation. it is a terrorist attack. no.a jew living in israel is no enemy of mine, so long as they do not seek to subvert or harm my people. diversity is not a strength. why do you care so much about europe, aren ’ t you an australian? radicalization is the rational response to degeneration the failure of assimilation expecting immigrants to assimilate to a dying, decadent culture is laughable. take from my views that which works, discard that which does not.victory is all that matters. but here ’ s the real kicker, the unarmed invader is far more dangerous to our people than the armed invader.

they need not be born here, share our race, our language, our culture or our beliefs. depending on the definition, sure. invade the cities, take the cities, battle in the streets for the cities. depending on the definition, sure. it wasn ’ t even close. to take revenge for the thousands of european lives lost to terror attacks throughout european lands.

>no, i spent many years travelling through many, many nations.