nor should you, why should you have peace when your other brothers in europe face certain war? yes, predominantly an ethno-nationalist (i place importance on the health and well being of my race above all else). on the east side of the bosphorus. embrace infamy: the enemies of your people will beset upon you, on all sides. it is a terrorist attack. they had long since lost their cities, take a look at auckland. to take revenge for the thousands of european lives lost to terror attacks throughout european lands. why do you care so much about europe, aren ’ t you an australian? until the hagia sophia is free of the minarets, the men of europe are men in name only the rape of european women invaders many of you may already know about the rape of british women by the invading forces, rotherham of course being the most well known case. but the only way to get to the final destination, total victory, is to get up and keep marching forward. though wise men at their end know dark is right, because their words had forked no lightning they do not go gentle into that good night.

those that wish a future for white children, and to ensure the existence of our people. to survive with our culture, but to lose our lands, to lose our future, is a defeat. no, but the next person to attack could be, so a healthy scepticism is a good thing. this wealth and prosperity was paid for in the sweat and blood of your ancestors. what culture would entice a man, one of traditions, beauty, architecture, art and prosperity, or a culture of decay, self-hatred, childlessness, disorder and nihilism? the french people were often in a minority themselves, and the french that were in the streets were often alone, childless or of advanced age.

>i had a regular childhood, without any great issues.