a political candidate that keeps the status quo or only seeks to introduce minimal change, even when the minimal change is in support of our cause, is ultimately useless or even damaging. one can not exist with the other. no man spoke it aloud when the saxon began to hate. art and beauty subverted beyond all recognition, bauhaus travesties replacing nouveau wonders, soulless metropolitan architecture of glass and steel reflecting no society, no culture, no people and therefore belonging everywhere, and no where. were/are you a โ islamophobe โ? this rapid change in demography will bring about a time of crisis, as the reality of our possible ethnic replacement becomes obvious to all, even the naysayers. it may upset many, but the truth of the matter is these people are directly responsible for the current invasion and sacking of europe and their treachery has damaged european prospects greatly. what do you encourage us to do? when they ask why, you tell them why. canvas public areas in support of radical positions, even if they are not your own. attacking these mosques also allowed for an extra planned attack on the mosque in ashburton, whilst i am unsure as of this time of writing whether i will reach that target, it was a bonus objective.
to agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to cause them to overextend their own hand and experience the eventual and inevitable backlash as a result. dear god no. but, if those same people seek to come to my peoples lands, replace my people, subjugate my people, make war upon on my people,, hen i shall be forced to fight them, and hold nothing in reserve. because if we do not destroy the invaders first, our own birthrates will mean nothing. no, i simply do not care all that much what gay people do.as long as they are loyal to their people and place their peoples well being first, then i have no issues. no one can give an answer.
>to take revenge for the thousands of european lives lost to terror attacks throughout european lands.