focusing on increasing the population of whites, or trying to gain economic wealth or military might, whilst already having met the requirement of numbers, wealth and military force needed is simply a stalling tactic, spoken and put forth by men too cowardly to do what is required. despite this ridiculous match up, the possibility of a victory by the quasi-nationalist was at least, to myself, a sign that maybe a political solution was still possible.the internationalist, globalist, anti-white, ex-banker won. striking quickly and then exfiltrating from the area of attack was the plan, to avoid the responders of the state and to avoid a situation where i was forced to harm them. the attackers in the plane that crashed into the field on the same day? ethnic autonomy? so yes. kill the invaders, kill the overpopulation and by doing so save the environment. their is no shared culture, ethnicity, language, values or beliefs. when anyone can be a german, a brit, a frenchmen, then being european has truly lost all meaning make no mistake, the erosion of local and national identity has no come about by accident, it is a concerted and targeted effort against the european people. who do you represent? what is an australian but a drunk european?
taxation is theft in a traitorous system section iv in conclusion out of the night that covers me, black as the pit from pole to pole, i thank whatever gods may be for my unconquerable soul. do not fret on the manner of how victory is achieved, all methods are possible, in the face of ethnic genocide, all morality is ambiguous. every day we become fewer in number, we grow older, we grow weaker. there was neither sign nor show when the saxon began to hate. violence is power and violence is the reality of history.wake up. why make your children fight, when you could fight in their stead?
>was there any reason you attacked that (those) mosque (s) in particular?