yes, i dislike them. it is far better to encourage radical, violent change regardless of its origins. 3.answers to detractors and to those that oppose my beliefs/methods won ’ t your attack do more harm than good? the more diverse a group becomes, the less equal it becomes. you wait for a signal, while your people wait for you it is never wise to become a minority group. radicalization is the rational response to degeneration the failure of assimilation expecting immigrants to assimilate to a dying, decadent culture is laughable. an act, which morals you doubt in the present, will be writ by your people in wonder and admiration in the books of history. they don ’ t even believe in the race, they don ’ t even have the gall to say race exists. the attack was planned to allow enough time to train, form a plan, settle my affairs, write down my views, then enact the attack. physical force is the ultimate form of support. to maintain a population the people must achieve a birthrate that reaches replacement fertility levels.
due to the threat of ethnic replacement and our own horribly low birth rates, we do not have 150 years or even 50 years to achieve positions of power. only for muslims. men of the west must be men once more. new zealand was not the original choice for attack, i only arrived to new zealand to live temporarily whilst i planned and trained, but i soon found out that new zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the west. yes, beyond all doubt, anti-immigration, anti-ethnic replacement and anti-cultural replacement. any invader you kill, of any age, is one less enemy your children will have to face.
>where they are removed to is not our concern, or responsibility.