why them when i could do it myself? but here ’ s the real kicker, the unarmed invader is far more dangerous to our people than the armed invader. didn ’ t your attack just result in the vilification of ethno-nationalists/racial autonomists? they would not be ignored. i'll have you know i graduated top of my class in the navy seals, and i've been involved in numerous secret raids on al-quaeda, and i have over 300 confirmed kills. the race? violence is power and violence is the reality of history.wake up. if the media or state in your region attacks them, destroy the corporation and traitorous politicians responsible. there is no single place in the west that is even close to reaching replacement level birthrates, let alone birthrates that indicate a level of vitality and vigour. a a one-point-seven percentage point difference may mean something to a few, but a ingeniously worded expression or brilliantly crafted poster will convince the many. the final push was witnessing the state of french cities and towns.

these leaders will be paragon examples of your people, virtuous, incorruptible, speaking truth to power and a truth that resonates with your very soul. no man spoke it aloud when the saxon began to hate. the media of the world will be used against you, the education system of the rulers will be used against you, the financial power of the worlds corporations will be used against you, the military and legislative might of the un, the eu and nato itself will be used against you and even your own, previously corrupted, religious leaders will be used against you. all so that they could line their pockets without complaints or objections the nation? why attack muslims if all high fertility immigrants are the issue? they need not be born here, share our race, our language, our culture or our beliefs.

>was there any reason you attacked that (those) mosque (s) in particular?