to ensure diverse peoples remain diverse, separate, unique, undiluted in unrestrained in cultural or ethnic expression and autonomy. not yet! but when europeans from all countries and continents move to back their brothers, they can not possibly attack any one group. somehow this isolation then radicalization is seen as a surprise, yet for anyone who was paying attention, it was a long time coming. nothing is conserved. depending on the definition, sure. mass immigration will disenfranchise us, subvert our nations, destroy our communities, destroy our ethnic binds, destroy our cultures, destroy our peoples. you may fall. was the attack anti-immigration in origin? what makes you believe you can speak for a group? but for some reason this was different.

why attack muslims if all high fertility immigrants are the issue? we must thrive, we must march ever forward to our place among the stars and we will reach the destiny our people deserve. but kill sixty unarmed invaders having shown the will and the intent to bring harm to your nation and people, and you will be considered a monster, dragged through the streets, ridiculed, attacked, your character assassinated in every way it can be and finally tried in court and imprisoned for the rest of your life. on the east side of the bosphorus. lobby those in power to show your support, protest outside embassies of those nations that do not support the nation, and if need be attack them. no.a jew living in israel is no enemy of mine, so long as they do not seek to subvert or harm my people.

>did they perceive us any differently after the attack than they did before?