>>1311045 (prev bread)
>hahaha thats a good theory
>the NWO/cabal is as religious as someone eating a steak is vegetarian
Well, you do realize that satanism is a religion, don't you?
>>1310577 (prev bread)
>everything is electricity.
>>1310616 (prev bread)
>Nope.
>Everything is INFORMATION.
>It really get relevant at around the 24m20s mark
That video is a joke, kek.
The basic message is, 'we'll explain to you what the consequences are of our theories, but we'll never explain how our theories actually work. You'll just have to trust us on that.'
The most obvious reason to reject this whole bs video and the theories behind it are as follow:
Near the end of the video, the 'physicist' explains that if their theory is correct, then our universe is just a simulation running inside of a computer within another, 'external' universe.
He then goes on to say that if that's true, then that other universe must also be a simulation running inside a computer within yrt another universe outside of that one.
And then the clincher, the deflection from the obvious 'mathematical' flaw in their theory. In his words:
'So the idea is a little shaky, but it's being discussed seriously by a lot of credible people.'
Why does he say, 'the idea is a little shaky'? Can you or anybody else guess?
…
…
Well the reason is that the scenario of one universe inside another universe inside another … leads to an 'infinite regress'. Which is completely irrational and non-defensible from any mathematical and/or scientific perspective.
Yet this clown, yes clown, brushes away the very concept that destroys and utterly refutes the theories he's promoting and then justifies his denial and rejection of that failure by using a well known logical fallacy; an appeal to authority:
' it's being discussed seriously by a lot of credible people'.
Science uses facts and logic to either accept or reject the validity of theories.
Mathematical impossibilities like infinite regress cannot be ignored and brushed away by using logical fallacies.
I wanted to say , 'close, but no cigar' but actually there's a more fitting description:
He's so far off the mark he's not even wrong!.