the war will not be easy, the death toll will assuredly be high. was the attack anti-immigration in origin? they all turn on each other in the end. why did you choose new zealand as a place to attack? i remember pulling into a shopping centre car park to buy groceries in some moderate sized town in eastern france, of roughly 15-25 thousand people. an act, which morals you doubt in the present, will be writ by your people in wonder and admiration in the books of history. 2.answers to my people/supporters questions what are your views? this is an attack on the very french people themselves and is a strategy designed to destroy national, cultural, linguistic and ethnic unity. but for some reason this was different. they need not be born here, share our race, our language, our culture or our beliefs. that is complicated.
until these interlopers are repatriated to their peoples lands, then europe has no true sovereignty, and anyone, no matter their ethnicity or beliefs can call europe their own. a political and social stalemate that makes any advancement impossible. no matter where i travelled, no matter how small or rural the community i visited, the invaders were there. it was not suddenly bred, it will not swiftly abate, through the chilled years ahead, when time shall count from the date that the saxon began to hate. for example, actions such as voting for political candidates that radically change or challenge entrenched systems, radicalizing public discourse by both supporting, attacking, vilifying, radicalizing and exaggerating all societal conflicts and attacking or even assassinating weak or less radical leaders/influencers on either side of social conflicts. they were not easily moved, they were icy – willing to wait till every count should be proved, ere the saxon began to hate.