this is an attack on the very french people themselves and is a strategy designed to destroy national, cultural, linguistic and ethnic unity. yes. as a policy maker and leader? an act, which morals you doubt in the present, will be writ by your people in wonder and admiration in the books of history. force is power. the french people were often in a minority themselves, and the french that were in the streets were often alone, childless or of advanced age. don ’ t run from the fight, run towards the fight. i am sure the journalists will love that. any invader you kill, of any age, is one less enemy your children will have to face. when anyone can be a german, a brit, a frenchmen, then being european has truly lost all meaning make no mistake, the erosion of local and national identity has no come about by accident, it is a concerted and targeted effort against the european people. were/are you a neo-nazi?

there was a racial component to the attack. ethnic autonomy for all peoples with a focus on the preservation of nature, and the natural order. it was not preached to the crowd, it was not taught by the state. men of the west must be men once more. rampant urbanization and industrialization, ever expanding cities and shrinking forests, a complete removal of man from nature, with the obvious results. i am only wary of those cultures with higher fertility rates replacing others.

>there is no nation in the world that wasn ’ t founded by, or maintained by, the use of force.