i had little interest in education during my schooling, barely achieving a passing grade. is it not preferable to die in war rather than suffer any longer so horrible a spectacle? kill the invaders, kill the overpopulation and by doing so save the environment. i am sure the journalists will love that. i mostly agree with sir oswald mosley ’ s views and consider myself an eco-fascist by nature. but kill sixty unarmed invaders having shown the will and the intent to bring harm to your nation and people, and you will be considered a monster, dragged through the streets, ridiculed, attacked, your character assassinated in every way it can be and finally tried in court and imprisoned for the rest of your life. in the event of an engagement i had the somewhat quixotic notion of shouting down responding state enforcers, intimidating them into dropping their weapons and if that failed, only targeting non-vital areas of their body such as the anterior of the thigh, shoulder or a side-on through shot of the calf, hamstring or gluteal muscles so as to cause the least amount of harm as possible and to allow for a quick recovery. the candidates were an obvious sign of our times: a globalist, capitalist, egalitarian, an ex-investment banker was no national beliefs other than the pursuit of profit versus a milquetoast, feckless, civic nationalist, an uncontroversial figure who ’ s most brave and inspired idea resolved to the possible deportation of illegal immigrants. we attack as soon as possible, we attack with force and we achieve stability and play defense as the boomers pass, not during their passing, not after. but you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. were/are you a “ xenophobe ”? \ no, no culture scares me.
historical, societal and statistical reasons. despite this ridiculous match up, the possibility of a victory by the quasi-nationalist was at least, to myself, a sign that maybe a political solution was still possible.the internationalist, globalist, anti-white, ex-banker won. to ensure the existence of our people and a future for white children, whilst preserving and exulting nature and the natural order. new zealand was not the original choice for attack, i only arrived to new zealand to live temporarily whilst i planned and trained, but i soon found out that new zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the west. the attack was to ensure a preservation of beauty, art and tradition. no, but the next person to attack could be, so a healthy scepticism is a good thing.
>no one will willfully join the decay green nationalism is the only true nationalism there is no conservatism without nature, there is no nationalism without environmentalism, the natural environment of our lands shaped us just as we shaped it.