as only in times of radical change and social discomfort can great and terrific change occur. yes, and to plead not guilty.the attack was a partisan action against a occupying force, and i am a lawful, uniformed combatant. why attack immigrants when “ x ” are the issue? is it not preferable to die in war rather than suffer any longer so horrible a spectacle? on top of this is a two party political system, split by racial, social, cultural, linguistic and class divides. as for how the public perceives us? they are the most despised group of invaders in the west, attacking them receives the greatest level of support. born in australia to a working class, low income family. this is an attack on the very french people themselves and is a strategy designed to destroy national, cultural, linguistic and ethnic unity. -invictis by william ernest henley there is only one victory, but many defeats. all i can guarantee is that inaction is sure defeat, power structures will be tested and likely will fall and most of all there is only the future ahead and attempting to march back to any earlier time will get you no where at all.
the worth of your life is not measured by the length of your life, but your actions during it. when they ask why, you tell them why. we attack as soon as possible, we attack with force and we achieve stability and play defense as the boomers pass, not during their passing, not after. not a thing has been conserved other than corporate profits and the the ever increasing wealth of the 1 % that exploit the people for their own benefit. there is no one person equal to any other, not identical twins, not countrymen, not workers within a class group and certainly not those of differing races. were/are you are “ racist ”?
>in the end we must return to replacement fertility levels, or it will kill us.