if not me, then who? a path focusing on nature and respect for the environment, traditions, families, workers rights and personal and racial responsibilities. there is only one victory. new zealand was not the original choice for attack, i only arrived to new zealand to live temporarily whilst i planned and trained, but i soon found out that new zealand was as target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the west. the result is obvious. drive them from your lands and give the traitors what traitors deserve: a traitors death. to survive with our culture, but to lose our lands, to lose our future, is a defeat. rage, rage against the dying of the light. won ’ t your attack result in calls for the removal of gun rights from whites in the united states? venerate the ancestors but work for the children a soldiers fight the ideal of a heroic war, without loss, without failure, without some great setback, is idealistic and downright impossible. the natural environment is industrialized, pulverized and commoditized.

and above all they don ’ t even care if it does. they must be willing and wishing to be a part of this new future we envision.we can not, and should not, rely on oppression to encourage the population to fit this new paradigm. barring the importation of all goods produced outside the new european zone (the new western world) is an essential pillar of the future western economy. what remains? what makes you believe you can speak for a group? numbers aren ’ t everything, ten lions are worth of thousand sheep.the reason we are currently losing our lands is not due to a lack of numbers, or wealth, or military force.

>what part of diversity causes this increase in strength?