the unarmed invader is more dangerous that the armed the lightning march through the institutions while the lefts march through the institutions was long and ultimately successful we must achieve the same, but in a much shorter time period. as i sat there in the parking lot, in my rental car, i watched a stream of the invaders walk through the shopping centre ’ s front doors. the origins of my language is european, my culture is european, my political beliefs are european, my philosophical beliefs are european, my identity is european and, most importantly, my blood is european. refuse to pay taxes. because you can not accept anything less. yes, the person that has influenced me above all was candace owens. this is a tactic practiced not only on the french people, but on all the peoples of europe, effectively destroying the nations identity at its core and smashing apart all bonds which a successful, unified nation is built upon. but here ’ s the real kicker, the unarmed invader is far more dangerous to our people than the armed invader. was the attack “ islamophobic ” in origin? they need not be born here, share our race, our language, our culture or our beliefs. no.

the global market thus therefore never be allowed to compete in the new european market. this warlord must bleed his last, whilst he visits his ethnic soldiers currently occupying europe. why were we allowing the invaders to conquer us? diversity by its very definition belies equality. the natural environment is industrialized, pulverized and commoditized. did the groups you support/are aligned with order or promote your attack?