dear god no. barring the importation of all goods produced outside the new european zone (the new western world) is an essential pillar of the future western economy. it may upset many, but the truth of the matter is these people are directly responsible for the current invasion and sacking of europe and their treachery has damaged european prospects greatly. but for some reason this was different. to continue on without our culture, but still own our lands, is a defeat. fertility rates are cultural, there is no denying that, so there was a war of cultures being fought by the invaders, and my attack was a response to this. not a thing has been conserved other than corporate profits and the the ever increasing wealth of the 1 % that exploit the people for their own benefit. is there a particular person that radicalized you the most? but once i arrived in france, i found the stories to not only be true, but profoundly understated. venerate the ancestors but work for the children a soldiers fight the ideal of a heroic war, without loss, without failure, without some great setback, is idealistic and downright impossible. why do you blame immigrants and not the capitalists?
continued immigration into europe is environmental warfare and ultimately destructive to nature itself. therefore, once we show them the risk of bringing their offspring to our soil, they will avoid our lands. no, the attack was a end in itself, with all the necessary affect required. physical force is the ultimate form of support. so no, i don ’ t believe so. https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list_of_sovereign_states_and_dependencies _by_total_fertility_rate there is not a single western country, not a single white nation, that reaches these levels.