why make your children fight, when you could fight in their stead? to lose our lands, our culture and our people is a defeat. show the strength of your convictions, the truth of yours and the iron-hard strength of your will and they will follow. no, conservatism is corporatism in disguise, i want no part of it. striking quickly and then exfiltrating from the area of attack was the plan, to avoid the responders of the state and to avoid a situation where i was forced to harm them. but i believe it is a partisan action against an occupying force. each time she spoke i was stunned by her insights and her own views helped push me further and further into the belief of violence over meekness. which i do not mind. did/do you personally hate foreigners/other cultures? born in australia to a working class, low income family. pedophile politicians, pedophile priests and pedophile pop stars, demonstrating to all the true depravity of our age.

were/are you an anti-semite? no, the attack was a end in itself, with all the necessary affect required. that is a very broad category of people, and the definition is fuzzy at best. that is complicated. to agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to cause them to overextend their own hand and experience the eventual and inevitable backlash as a result. but here ’ s the real kicker, the unarmed invader is far more dangerous to our people than the armed invader.

>few parents, regardless of circumstance, will willing risk the lives of their children, no matter the economic incentives.