why did you target those people? the survival of our people, our culture and our lands isn ’ t enough. democracy is the only solution, why are you committing to force? the candidates were an obvious sign of our times: a globalist, capitalist, egalitarian, an ex-investment banker was no national beliefs other than the pursuit of profit versus a milquetoast, feckless, civic nationalist, an uncontroversial figure who ’ s most brave and inspired idea resolved to the possible deportation of illegal immigrants. despite this ridiculous match up, the possibility of a victory by the quasi-nationalist was at least, to myself, a sign that maybe a political solution was still possible.the internationalist, globalist, anti-white, ex-banker won. what makes you believe you are european, not just an australian? the people who are to blame most are ourselves, european men. to add momentum to the pendulum swings of history, further destabilizing and polarizing western society in order to eventually destroy the current nihilistic, hedonistic, individualistic insanity that has taken control of western thought. yes, that is the plan all along, you said you would fight to protect your rights and the constitution, well soon will come the time. a political and social stalemate that makes any advancement impossible. stop running, start fighting emotions rule over facts stop trying to persuade the general population with statistics, charts, tablets and figures.
the christchurch and linwood mosques had far more invaders, in a more prominent and optically foreign building, with less students, more adults and a prior history of extremism. they are also one of the strongest groups, with high fertility, high in group preference and a will to conquer. they all turn on each other in the end. nor should you, why should you have peace when your other brothers in europe face certain war? it is a terrorist attack. if not me, then who?
>nations across asia, europe and the americas are facing this disaster together.