to continue on without our culture, but still own our lands, is a defeat. once the corporate and state medias grip on the zeitgeist of modernity was finally broken by the internet, true freedom of thought and discussion flourished and the overton window was not just shifted, but shattered. stability and comfort are the enemies of revolutionary change. how are they so strong, china set to be the worlds most dominant nation in this century, whilst lacking diversity? nothing else will do. any method that gives these traitors their sure reward is viable and should be encouraged. from where did you receive/research/develop your beliefs? why did you choose to use firearms? the christchurch and linwood mosques had far more invaders, in a more prominent and optically foreign building, with less students, more adults and a prior history of extremism. were you taught violence and extremism by video games, music, literature, cinema? there is no pleasant meadow in which you can lay down your weary body, rest your head and wait for it all to blow over.

people from every walk of life, in every place of employment and field but disproportionately employed in military services and law enforcement. a political candidate that keeps the status quo or only seeks to introduce minimal change, even when the minimal change is in support of our cause, is ultimately useless or even damaging. why make your children fight, when you could fight in their stead? the going will be tough and many of us will die. the war will not be easy, the death toll will assuredly be high. in the united states, perhaps more than anywhere else in the world, the cult of the individual has been practiced for the longest time and with the deepest devotion.