depending on the definition, sure. brazil with all its racial diversity is completely fractured as a nation, where people can not get along and separate and self segregate whenever possible. these situations are chaotic and virtually impossible to control, no matter the planning. without a single shot fired in response? was there a political figure or party in history you most associate yourself with? a political candidate that keeps the status quo or only seeks to introduce minimal change, even when the minimal change is in support of our cause, is ultimately useless or even damaging. we must not be in a chaotic, life or death civil war at a time when our rival nations are at their peak of dominance. this pakistani muslim invader now sits as representative for the people of london. the truth is that eventually people must face the fact that it wasn ’ t a damn thing to do with the economy.that it was the british people firing back at mass immigration, cultural displacement and globalism, and that ’ s a great and wonderful thing. something, this time, was different. who do you follow?

enemies bound by faith, culture or tradition with higher levels of fertility, trust and in group preference resulting in much stronger communities. for every french man or woman there was double the number of invaders. lobby those in power to show your support, protest outside embassies of those nations that do not support the nation, and if need be attack them. no man spoke it aloud when the saxon began to hate. were/are you a socialist? not a place where english is the defacto language but a place where every european language, belief and tradition is valued.

>did you intend to survive the attack?