dChan
Anonymous ID: 2b8cd4 May 5, 2018, 11:07 p.m. No.1315950   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5958 >>5977 >>5993

>>1315932

 

Which one of these is so over target that it had to be removed?

 

>>1315111 Operation Smile & Swift Trucking & YMCA

 

>>1315133 DAM RIGHT KANYE WEST!!! (youtube)

 

>>1315177 What to do with monuments with satanic symbology?, >>1315238 Divine in origin?

Anonymous ID: 2b8cd4 May 5, 2018, 11:20 p.m. No.1316039   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6086

>>1316009

A famous letter written in 1884 by the great Italian Maestro Giuseppe Verdi to the Italian government is often quoted in support of the 432 Hz movement. In this letter, Verdi expressed his concern for the raising and fluctuations of the pitch (which at that time had not yet been standardized). He asked for and obtained a regulation of the pitch at 432 Hz. His main arguments were to do with the difficulties of Opera singers and the risks that ancient instruments underwent when tuned to a higher pitch than the one they had been built for. Actually, in his letter, Verdi asked the Italian government to conform to the French standard of that time, which was 435 Hz. He then added that if the Italian commission believed that for mathematical reasons the reference pitch should be lowered to 432 Hz, he would absolutely agree with that. It is interesting to notice here that 432 Hz is related to mathematical values. Unfortunately, in Verdi’s letter there is no mention of the reasons why this frequency would be preferred “for mathematical reasons”. It is likely though that 432 would be preferred for ease of calculations of all the other relative frequencies. Another important aspect is that A = 432 Hz can be understood as the upper limit of the tuning based on C = 256 Hz. Now, this might seem a bit confusing, but the 432 Hz issue cannot be really separated from the notion of ‘scientific tuning’ which corresponds to middle C on the piano keyboard (the C note just below the A 432 Hz note) tuned at 256 Hz. We will get to this later.