Anonymous ID: e6e2d8 March 6, 2021, 11:07 a.m. No.13164024   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4098

>>13164015

you make a bald statement as if there is a 'they' that decides all formal structure.

that is untrue.

structures that work evolve over time within guilds and trades, and no one is 'controlling' that.

you assumptions are false, and thus your narrative is a throw away, and yet you pretend to speak of a 'true source' which, to me, flags you as an intellectual philanderer and charlton.

but I could be wrong as you might not be what I see.

Anonymous ID: e6e2d8 March 6, 2021, 11:30 a.m. No.13164113   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4131

>>13164098

anon, you need to read and understand (whihc is rather hard) Wittgenstien specifically on 'the use of language'

 

langauge is a tool.

 

this think you do : the thinging about "perfectly expressing" is, as well, a misunderstanding of the use of language.

 

you think that a thing is perfection? necessary?

however, the real truth: we draw with broad strokes and give only as much detail as needed for the purpose of the interaction.

 

hammer.

nails

board.

hold the ladder.

hold the ladder!

hammer.

water.

glass of water for the ladder nailer.

don't drop the hammer.

watch out!

 

all of those are incomplete expressions of 'formalized' interaction however, are perfect in the way they work.

 

the ones who feel threatened shouldn't stand underneath the architrave when the workers are up on the ladders maintaining or enhancing the building!!

 

look out below!

Anonymous ID: e6e2d8 March 6, 2021, 12:04 p.m. No.13164204   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4248

>>13164131

you only need enough accuracy so you know the meaning. Anymore is not needed.

people minimize their interactions by making very terse sttemetns that are only meaningful within a specific contest.

accuracy isn't needed at the level that you imply. And if it is, people ask for clarification.

only within a pedagogical context would over detailed and descriptive narratives be needed.

for example, one does not need to describe all the panels on a great big door to a gigantic basilica to enter the cavernous interior.

they merely need to hear the voice of a friend 'let's go in here.' and, voila! they are inside the inner place and seeing things that they never knew about before. And maybe unable to have all the words to say just what they saw in there, but still they saw it.