Anonymous ID: d0c051 March 8, 2021, 12:36 a.m. No.13169707   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9801 >>9833

Constitutional Convention

 

Why the Article V Convention Process is a Threat

As outlined in Common Cause’s 2015 report, The Dangerous Path: Big Money’s Plan to Shred the Constitution, a constitutional convention is open to many problems, including:

• THREAT OF A RUNAWAY CONVENTION: There is nothing in the Constitution to prevent a constitutional convention from being expanded in scope to issues not raised in convention calls passed by the state legislatures, and therefore could lead to a runaway convention.

• INFLUENCE OF SPECIAL INTERESTS: An Article V convention would open the Constitution to revisions at a time of extreme gerrymandering and polarization amid unlimited political spending. It could allow special interests and the wealthiest to re-write the rules governing our system of government.

• LACK OF CONVENTION RULES: There are no rules governing constitutional conventions. A convention would be an unpredictable Pandora’s Box; the last one, in 1787, resulted in a brand-new Constitution. One group advocating for a “Convention of States” openly discusses the possibility of using the process to undo hard-won civil rights and civil liberties advances and undermine basic rights extended throughout history as our nation strove to deliver on the promise of a democracy that works for everyone.

• THREAT OF LEGAL DISPUTES: No judicial, legislative, or executive body would have clear authority to settle disputes about a convention, opening the process to chaos and protracted legal battles that would threaten the functioning of our democracy and economy.

• APPLICATION PROCESS UNCERTAINTY: There is no clear process on how Congress or any other governmental body would count and add up Article V applications, or if Congress and the states could restrain the convention’s mandate based on those applications.

• POSSIBILITY OF UNEQUAL REPRESENTATION: It is unclear how states would choose delegates to a convention, how states and citizens would be represented in a convention, and who would ultimately get to vote on items raised in a convention.

 

Simply put, an Article V constitutional convention is a dangerous and uncontrollable process that would put Americans’ constitutional rights up for grabs.

 

At a time when extreme gerrymandering has created unprecedented polarization and big money buys access and influence for a few very wealthy special interests, a new constitutional convention would lead to chaos; the interests of everyday Americans would be shut out of the ultimate closed-door meeting. There would be no way to limit the scope of a constitutional convention and no way to guarantee that our civil liberties and constitutional process would be protected.

 

The constitutional rights and civil liberties that could be impacted in an Article V convention include the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, privacy rights, the guarantee of equal protection under law, the right to vote, immigration issues, and the right to counsel and a jury trial.

 

https://www.commoncause.org/resource/u-s-constitution-threatened-as-article-v-convention-movement-nears-success

 

What people don’t understand is that in this “we give Congress the right to change the Constitution”—is open ended. We don’t get to pick what parts to change. It is like giving a loaded gun to a 3 year old.

Anonymous ID: d0c051 March 8, 2021, 1:29 a.m. No.13169754   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13169719

The Dems destroyed the military absentee ballots. They were buy the votes of Native Americans. They STILL had to cheat bigtime.

This will end soon. PLEASE SOON!

Anonymous ID: d0c051 March 8, 2021, 1:31 a.m. No.13169757   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9760

>>13169752

Amazing Polly does a wonderful expose of Sullivan. His brother is in BLM. He had a third brother, but no info on him. His dad works for the gov-a spook I think. But, PSYOP for sure.

Anonymous ID: d0c051 March 8, 2021, 3:10 a.m. No.13169860   🗄️.is 🔗kun

the disclaimer is at the bottom of every post. who is the dick head that post them as a comment to a post? try a check mark dickhead