I'd be more interested in what happened in the Jussie Smollett case on March 5 because there has been nothing, zip, nada reported on it.
All this farce of a trial is aimed at is creating another excuse for race riots when Chauvinist is found not guilty.
Don't forget to remind us again that Elizardbreath is just a sweet, kindly old old woman who has only ever had at heart the well being of the citizens of her realm.
Mayhap I just mistook you for the GCHQ clown who's been on here the past couple of days claiming that MBS and Elizardbreath are best buddies and Lizzy really isn't a reincarnation of Lizzie Bordan.
If not you, then just a bad case of friendly fire.
Shadillay
>FUCK NIGGERS!
>FUCK KIKES
>FUCK TRANNIES!
Listen, I don't care what you do in the privacy of your own homo love nest, but please don't rub it in our faces.
How much more F&G would you like?
There was nothing about that story that was even logical to warrant even a first look let a lone a second.
And with how hard it was being pushed on here that should have been more than enough of a heads up.
Why do you feel the need to keep including past stories in notables?
It's not as if you can claim ignorance when you were the one who notabled them in the first place!
>how else would fruit, beverages and empty test containers come out positive
Run it through enough cycles and anything will come back testing positive. That is why the WHO lowered the recommended number of cycles when Bidan was crowned.
>What's wrong with the story and it being notable?
Nothing is wrong with it being notabled …
once! Furthermore, the first time it was notabled it came from a far better sauce than some randon blogspot site.
The first result on DDG shows it was first published on March 7 - 2 days ago.
>Please be patient with the re-posting of previous notables as we are in the process of awakening people.
Are you of the opinion that this is being achieved through 3 pages of fluff and reposts per bread?
Quite unintentionally, I only discovered that there were quite a number of German born actresses in Hollywood shortly after the war, including many from the European royal families.
Countess Elizabeth Caroline Maria Agatha Felicitas Therese von Fürstenberg-Herdringen is but one of them.
>I don't think that's an accurate representation.
You are entitled to your opinion, but I'd be damned interested in a straw poll of real anons to see if 'you're opinion is indeed the in the majority.
Once upon a time notables were, well, actually notable. Hiding one or two genuine notables in 2 or 3 pages of fluff should be, at the very least, called out and baker held to account as it does less than zero to advance the objectives of Q Research, which I don't claim is the same thing as the objective of many bakers.
I called out baker yesterday for notabling a story about a sponge growing back its body or some equally inane and irrelevant nonsense.
What a load of condescending codswallop.
Fuck me, you faggots do backflips to justify your own agenda.
>Define Fluff
Here's a couple from the current notable bun that adequately define fluff.
and then there's three consecutive stories with the same basic premise.
Are these all advancing the objective of Q Research?
>curious as to why anon would pick this notable above all the others to bring attention to?
Because I have seen it so many times I can practically quote it verbatim.
>have yet to define 'Fluff/Bloatables'
Noun.
Useless verbiage used as a filler to hide anything noteworthy.